United Nations - What We Do: Maintain International Peace and Security
The United Nations came into being in 1945, following the devastation of the Second World War, with one central mission: the maintenance of international peace and security. The UN does this by working to prevent conflict; helping parties in conflict make peace; peacekeeping; and creating the conditions to allow peace to hold and flourish. *

The United Nations (UN) is the mother of all globalist organizations and says about itself that its mission is the maintenance of international peace and security. But which wars and which genocides was it able to prevent or stop since its creation? None. With the creation of the League of Nations, the precursor of the UN, directly after World War I, its globalist elite also proclaimed peace and security, but the so-called "peace" Treaty of Versailles led directly to World War II. And the end of World War II was the beginning of the Cold War which culminated in the New Cold War. Many aggressive wars were fought led by the United States and the United Kingdom, two permanent members of the UN Security Council, none of them were prevented by the UN. According to the Charter of the United Nations which was signed in 1945...

Charter of the United Nations: Chapter II, Article 4
Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgement of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations. *

But for example South Africa became member when it ruled by means of a racist apartheid regime. Chile went from dictator to dictator during its UN membership. Saudi Barbaria, the world's foremost sponsor of Islamic terrorism, was a member from the beginning. Ukraine is known as the most corrupt nation in Europe. The Soviet Union was led by Joseph Stalin, the mass murderer who made Hitler look like a schoolboy. Argentina's Peronism was labeled "Latin American fascism". The apartheid state Israel became a member in 1949 after it was founded by means of ethnic cleansing of Palestinian people which it continued to do throughout its existence. Many nations were human rights abusers when they became UN members and they were human rights abusers during their membership.

The 5 UN Security Council permanent members are also the largest arms dealers in the world: US, Russia, China, UK and France.** They make profit from wars. They are all nuclear powers and form a nuclear veto club which tells the rest of the world to do as they say, not as they do.

The Oil-for-Food Programme was introduced by US president Bill Clinton's administration in 1995, as a response to arguments that ordinary Iraqi citizens were inordinately affected by the international economic sanctions aimed at the demilitarisation of Saddam Hussein's Iraq, imposed in the wake of the first Gulf War. It was plagued by corruption and all this happened under the auspices of Boutros Boutros-Ghali, sixth Secretary-General of the United Nations. He would later be replaced by Kofi Annan who was accused of gross mismanagement in the final report of the Paul Volcker Committee...

Nile Gardiner - The Final Volcker Oil for Food Report
The 500-page report paints an ugly tableau of bribery, kickbacks, corruption, and fraud on a global scale-without a doubt the biggest financial scandal in modern history. It amply demonstrates how the Iraqi dictator generously rewarded those who supported the lifting of U.N. sanctions on Iraq and who paid lip-service to his barbaric regime. Oil-for-Food became a shameless political charade through which Saddam Hussein attempted to manipulate decision-making at the U.N. Security Council by buying the support of influential figures in Russia and France. *

Benon Sevan was the head of the Oil-for-Food Programme. He stonewalled efforts to review and investigate the programme. Probably because he was charged with taking nearly $160,000 in bribes and later fled to his native Cyprus.** Natwar Singh stepped down as foreign minister of India in November 2005 amid allegations that he and his son had benefited from the scam.** Later in 2014 he wrote a book called One Life * in which he sticks feathers up his own ass and blames other politicians in India for corruption. "One life" is certainly not enough for all the corruption and lies these kind of people have in store for the world. According to the BBC more than 2,000 firms linked to the UN oil-for-food programme in Iraq were involved.** The western banking cartel was also involved because such level of corruption needs a financial backbone to be possible in the first place.

Samuel Totten, Paul R. Bartrop - The United Nations and genocide: Prevention, intervention, and prosecution
The UN has to date not been effective in preventing genocide, and has had only a slightly better record in stopping it. There have been occasions when its interventions has occurred only after a genocide has taken place, and even then its major focus has been on facilitating the provision of aid by non-governmental agencies rather than on the task of tracking down the perpetrators and bringing them to justice.

Deborah Mayersen - The United Nations and Genocide
The UN was unable to respond effectively to the genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, the Balkans and Darfur.

The Srebrenica massacre and the Darfur crisis are examples where the UN failed miserably in preventing genocide. See for example the documentary Srebrenica massacre: Is it meant to be? * On top of that, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the UN World Health Organization, is accused of turning a blind eye on genocide in Ethiopia.****

Jasmine-Kim Westendorf, Louise Searle - Sexual exploitation and abuse in peace operations: trends, policy responses and future directions
In 2013, a UN investigation declared sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) ‘the most significant risk to UN peacekeeping missions, above and beyond other key risks including protection of civilians’. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon himself asserted that ‘a single substantiated case of [SEA] involving UN personnel is one case too many’. Yet civilian and military personnel associated with peacekeeping operations (PKOs) continue to perpetrate SEA, despite the development of policy frameworks designed to prevent it and hold perpetrators accountable.

Sarah Smith - Accountability and sexual exploitation and abuse in peace operations
In March 2016, the United Nations Security Council adopted its first resolution devoted entirely to the prevention of peacekeeper sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) in peace operations. This article examines resolution 2272 by drawing on past practice and the perspective of those at mission sites—namely, Timor-Leste—arguing that the mechanism it establishes—repatriation—is limited in its capacity to prevent SEA and provide justice outcomes. The article demonstrates the pervasive sense of powerlessness regarding SEA and the impunity of those who do perpetrate SEA.

UN peacekeeping missions are plagued by sexual abuse involving mostly women and children.** What is known about this is only the tip of the iceberg because there is strong underreporting of sexual abuse* and of course the globalist elite will do everything in their power to prevent the world from knowing too much about it.

Ludovic Tournès - The Rockefeller Foundation and the Transition from the League of Nations to the UN (1939–1946)
The Rockefeller Foundation played an important role in the transition from the League of Nations to the United Nations through its collaboration with two international organisations. The first was the Economic, Financial and Transit Department (EFTD) of the LoN. By financing its move to the United States and all of its work during the Second World War, the RF would allow it to make a major contribution to the reorganisation of the global economic order after 1945. The second organisation was the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA), which the RF provided with staff, working methods, and a network of contacts around the world. The RF was thus deeply involved in the redefinition of the overall structure of the system of international organisations during WWII.

The Rockefellers are globalists with tremendous power and they were instrumental in the decision to locate the United Nations in New York.** On 25 March 1947 the Rockefellers gave the Secretary-General of the United Nations a check of $8,500,000 for the purchase of the 6-block Manhattan East River site.** The Rockefeller Foundation has supported United Nations programs throughout its history. Ironically, the UN headquarters are built on the site of a former slaughter house where so many livestock were killed that the area used to be called "blood alley".**

In 1948 the World Health Organization (WHO) was formed. It says about itself that it works worldwide to promote health, keep the world safe, and serve the vulnerable.** It is a United Nations specialized agency run by the globalist power elite. Governments and sheeple around the world follow the recommendations given by powerful organizations like WHO without question, because these organizations are presented as the "pinnacle of truth". But are they primarily concerned about public health or are there conflicting interests at play? By the end of 2021, more than one year after the outbreak of COVID-1984, the WHO was sponsored by the following organizations...

screenshot

The WHO is run by the globalist power elite and it is sponsored by governments around the world with taxpayer money. All parties involved have strong financial interests. For example the Gates Foundation and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI Alliance) have strong interests with for example the sales of vaccines. During COVID-1984 the elite of the multibillion dollar vaccine industry made huge profits while the large majority of the population suffered under lockdowns. The governments, that use taxpayer money to fund organizations like the WHO, blindly followed orders from the globalist power elite in control of the same organizations. On top of that, national health organizations like for example the FDA in the US, are in close contact and have a Mutual Confidentiality Arrangement with the WHO by which they don't have to disclose information to the public which funds them.** Birds of a feather flock together.


Thomas Mountain - The Gangster Head of the WHO
The head of the World Health Organization, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus, was a senior capo for the Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF) gangster mafia that ruled Ethiopia from 1991-2018. During that time he served as Health Minister and Foreign Minister, cementing his credentials as a member of the inner circle of what was one of if not the most corrupt, brutal and genocidal regimes to set foot on this planet in the past 30 years. *

During his time with the TPLF, WHO chief Tedros was linked to for example the Clinton Foundation, Gates Foundation and the GAVI Alliance.** All these parties are heavily involved in the WHO and the global vaccine business. In May 2022, two and a half years after the start of COVID-1984, we read the following...

David Bell - The Corruption of the World Health Organization
The whole humanitarian and global health world knows these facts. Even bankers can figure this out; the International Finance Facility considers that twice as many children died from lockdowns as died from Covid-19, while the Bank of International Settlements, key to international finance, recognizes that gross domestic product is a major determinant of long-term health. Yet the WHO, as a public health body, acts as if unaware, even ignoring their standard age-dependent metrics for disease burden as they seek to justify policies that will increase child deaths to target a disease predominantly of the unwell elderly. *

See also COVID-1984, Planet Lockdown, HCQ and VacciNATION.